noauthority.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Long live NAS!

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.4K
active users

I focus on NAS so much I forgot about the retards on shitpoast. What a bunch of losers.

@FourOh-LLC

You do seem to focus on NAS!

Looking at your timeline, it seems mostly NAS folks you follow and boost.

Not to mention the main concern with NAS - the fact that its users are there to seek and enforce conformity. All I need to do is criticize NAS and you will see the "community" rising up to "defend it", to defend their "free speech platform".

The fact that the fiercest ones have no stake in NAS, invested nothing to sustain NAS, eludes most casual observers.

This cannot be any other way, all large nodes end up at the same point where the majority of "community members" are opportunists and abusers.

They should be kicked back and told to stay on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, Truth Social, WhatsApp, Reddit, Telegram, Snapchat, TikTok, WeChat, Instagram, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Quora, Discord, Tumblr, Flickr, and dozens more.

The Fediverse should be proudly operated by single-user nodes.

@FourOh-LLC

Nice speech!

Yeah, for one, I have no clue how to operate a node, so that's not going to work for me.

I've joined other servers, and it is a bunch of people posting into the ether, as if we are listening, yet no one is responding, liking or boosting. Boring as fuxk.

And the federated timeline is filthy, and requires a heavy blocking to clean up.

To my original point, there seems to be a reason your timeline is filled with NAS posts and responses.

@viber @FourOh-LLC

You nailed the problem with the Fediverse: lots of people spewing updates, not much organic interaction.

We see why the algos came about...
@amerika @viber @FourOh-LLC >not much organic interaction
You sir have it backwards

@0

Like when people jump in it gets impossible to understand...

BUT I think a general rule is that if your post gets crickets, it missed the mark. Do better next time.

@amerika @dcc @FourOh-LLC

@viber @amerika @dcc @FourOh-LLC

I worry about network traffic in terms of what a node might need to handle, sure, but unless there's something functionally wrong I am not trying to diagnose social maladies like a lack of specific types of interaction.

@0

I see, if I'm getting the jist, there's the people who care about the tech, and then people like me who care about content and experience.

In my case exclusively, because I don't do tech.

I'm looking for Facebook or Twitter without spying and tracking.

@amerika @dcc @FourOh-LLC

No, you are not getting it.

Huge nodes like NAS has nowhere to go but bust. Owner-operated networks like mine outlive them and outperform all of them. Especially when you are considering a REAL community like a condo association the nodes have a chance to last human generations.

Purpose-built networks sustain far longer than general, aimless nodes.
supaSirViber

@FourOh-LLC

Not getting it? I guess. Except that reality is fluid.

And obviously NAS has value because it exists and is "huge".

Your condo node also has value.

@amerika @dcc @0

NAS has no value, and its burning a hole in the admin's pocketses.
@FourOh-LLC @amerika @0 @viber >NAS has no value,
You don't own a instance with people so ofc you think this.
You are not supposed to "own an instance with other people". You are supposed to own... your own.
@FourOh-LLC @dcc @0 @viber

I miss the old BBS model:

* Users had handles they guarded via goodwill
* Sysops put up local boards
* UUCP let them communicate
How are NAS boomers of all people living rent free in this retard's head?
@Hoss @amerika @dcc @0 @viber @FourOh-LLC
NAS has been showing a lot of character lately, maybe it's the streaks of grey in my beard talking but most of them are pretty based. It shows with how hard they cause faggots to ree and whine like the hater in this thread.
@istvan is the only NAS boomer I regularly interact with, but I see their users in my feed occasionally.

@Hoss @amerika @dcc @0 @istvan @viber @dj @FourOh-LLC

>> Not to mention the main concern with NAS - the fact that its users are there to seek and enforce conformity.

This is the part I like best.

@FourOh-LLC

Eriner seems to sort of like doing it.

If not, as has nearly happened more than I can know of, then its gone.

You see, I've learned that most the people on NAS actually have real lives and families, and expertise in all sorts if things.

I burn my online presences regularly, and can handle it happening again. Might be nice actually.

@amerika @dcc @0

The Fediverse is simply not designed for half the stuff Matt and his crew is doing. OK, lets take a step back and refactor.

How many times did NAS promote owner-operator status? I mean I made a thousand statement over the years about the Fediverse depending on owner-operators installing and using the software.. not just one of two mega-sized nodes but thousands of individuals.

Then what about all the "fallout" that keeps happening between all the crew, they lost noagenda and they will lose noauthority.

Let me spare you more of the same. I have a purpose here, and part of it is to remind you of facts and details NAS will never mention to you.

@FourOh-LLC @amerika @dcc @0 @viber

You one mind readin' son bitch, Sandor.

Again, I experienced the loss of the LUG, I was there for its full life cycle. Its not too difficult to foresee what is going to happen to the Fediverse when only ActivityPub and Mastodon left standing, with massive shitpoast nodes.

@FourOh-LLC @amerika @dcc @0 @viber

> what is going to happen to the Fediverse when only ActivityPub and Mastodon left standing

Sir, at least one of those words doesn't mean what you think it means.

You one mind readin' son bitch, Matt.
@FourOh-LLC @dcc @0 @viber

I think NAS is a decent community, mostly brought on by what John and Adam did with the podcast.

There was some bad faith over the break and this will continue I think.

People just want a conservative hangout where they can be heard and not be censored.