noauthority.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Long live NAS!

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.3K
active users

Sir Spooky of the Elm Streets

Even if you live in blue Illinois or California - VOTE TRUMP AND DRIVE UP THE POPULAR VOTE.

“TOO BIG TO RIG”

@takash

how do you explain Republican congressmen claiming Trump was cheated in the same process using the same ballots that they accept confirmed their reelection? maybe these people are lying to you...

So don't vote and try to win the popular vote because it might not be rigged?

@wjmaggos @takash

if the dems manage to install kamala, there’s no one they can’t put in. without their lies and media collusion, orange man wins 45 states. we’ll have to settle for 34.

@wjmaggos the goal is 1) to run up the score early, 2) to get most votes in before any “glitches” or “bursting water pipes” prevent people from voting on election day.

They can still cheat on election day with mail in ballots, and larger early voting is giving them a hint as to how many extra ballots they’ll have to print. It’s a lose-lose situation. But if Trump somehow manages 80 million votes like Biden, Harris will need 85/90. At what point does it become so obvious to the average person?

@takash

I asked a basic question. congressmen accepted elections that turned out in their favor were fair, while claiming there was widespread cheating (that obviously also could have affected their elections too) cause it prevented Trump from winning. you don't seem to care what actually happened. you have a belief and push any claim that supports it while dismissing what doesn't. you trust the reporting/pundits that say what you want while arguing against trusting those who disagree.

@wjmaggos, ah, I see your point, sorry. What congressman specifically are we talking about here? JCD harps on this frequently, but the use of “widespread” is dubious. It doesn’t have to be widespread to sway the election.

And from what I remember in 2020, there were races where Republicans won in big numbers down ballot, yet somehow didn’t vote Trump at the top of the ticket.

Let’s see what happens tomorrow night, and I promise to be FAIR 👍

@takash

you and JCD are misinterpreting why the term "widespread cheating" etc is used. it's shorthand in place of saying "enough problems to sway the election". how would you prefer to refer to it every time in a way that can't be nitpicked by someone motivated to do so? it's like the democracy vs republic bitching. or was it really a vax?

a lot of his supporters like him cause he's not typical GOP and you're shocked some typical GOP voters wouldn't vote for him?

thehill.com/homenews/house/532

@wjmaggos @takash Who gives a sh!t what some unnamed GOP congressperson says. Try to find another example where an incumbent increased his vote total and still lost. We'll wait here while your side is stuffing the ballot boxes with people.

@EvilSandmich @takash

now you're counting popular votes? perhaps you've heard of the electoral college? we've only had one incumbent president lose recently and if you give 3/4 of Perot's votes to HW, he would have increased his vote total and still lost. you guys love Trump cause he's divisive but somehow refuse to acknowledge that this would mean that after years of exposure to him, he'd increase the number of people of former non voters who both want to vote for and against him.